Skip to content

Cart

Your cart is empty

Article: Breaking Down Watch Movements: Quartz vs. Automatic vs. Manual

Breaking Down Watch Movements: Quartz vs. Automatic vs. Manual

Every luxury watch collector knows that the movement—the mechanism that powers the watch—is its beating heart. Yet, not all movements are created equal. Understanding the difference between quartz, automatic, and manual movements is crucial for appreciating their value, heritage, and performance.


1. Quartz Movements: Precision and Accessibility

Introduced in the late 1960s, quartz watches revolutionized timekeeping. They run on a battery that sends an electrical signal through a quartz crystal, which vibrates at 32,768 times per second to regulate time.

  • Pros: Highly accurate, affordable, and low-maintenance.

  • Cons: Lacks the artistry and heritage appeal of mechanical watches.

  • Examples: Rolex Oysterquartz (discontinued but collectible), TAG Heuer Formula 1, Grand Seiko Quartz models.

Quartz watches remain popular for everyday use but are generally less desirable to collectors seeking mechanical artistry.


2. Automatic Movements: The Collector’s Favorite

Automatic (or self-winding) watches are powered by a rotor that winds the mainspring as the wearer moves their wrist. This eliminates the need for manual winding while retaining the beauty of mechanical craftsmanship.

  • Pros: Blends convenience with tradition, strong presence in luxury market.

  • Cons: Requires regular wear or a watch winder to keep running.

  • Examples: Rolex Submariner, Omega Seamaster Diver 300M, Audemars Piguet Royal Oak.

Automatic watches dominate the collector market thanks to their balance of practicality and horological heritage.


3. Manual Movements: Tradition and Purity

Also called hand-wound movements, these watches require the wearer to wind the crown regularly to tighten the mainspring. They represent the most traditional form of mechanical watchmaking.

  • Pros: Slimmer case designs, direct connection to the craft, romantic appeal to purists.

  • Cons: Less convenient—requires winding every 1–3 days.

  • Examples: Patek Philippe Calatrava, A. Lange & Söhne Lange 1, Panerai Luminor Base Logo.

Manual watches are prized by connoisseurs who value the ritual of winding and the artistry of hand-finished movements.


Key Differences at a Glance

Feature Quartz Automatic Manual
Power Source Battery & Quartz Rotor & Mainspring Mainspring
Accuracy ±15 seconds/month ±5–15 seconds/day ±5–15 seconds/day
Maintenance Battery change Regular servicing Regular servicing
Collector Appeal Low–Medium High Very High (purists)

Conclusion

Each movement type serves a purpose: Quartz offers precision and affordability, Automatic blends convenience with mechanical beauty, and Manual connects wearers to the oldest traditions of watchmaking. A balanced collection often includes all three, reflecting the full spectrum of horological artistry.

At Investment Watches, we help collectors not just buy watches, but understand the movements that bring them to life.

Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.